Thanks Boss!

by Airframes fitter Thu Oct 01, 2009 07:01

Who will pay for BAE's Bribery scandal, our fat-cat bosses, or the workers on Bristol factory floor?

Fraud watchdog poised to decide on BAE bribery prosecution.The Serious Fraud Office is expected imminently to announce whether it will take the politically momentous decision to seek to prosecute BAE over bribery allegations. The UK arms giant failed tonight to meet a deadline to settle the case or face the courts.

Sources close to the SFO said that the agency would decide what to do tomorrow or Friday. After months of fruitless negotiation, BAE had been given a deadline by the SFO to plead guilty in a negotiated plea deal which would at last draw a line under a six-year investigation into the company's behaviour.

Both sides were refusing to reveal their hand tonight in what appears to be a high-stakes poker game between Britain's biggest arms firm and the agency entrusted with eradicating foreign bribery.

Richard Alderman, the agency's director, has been widely reported as in a determined mood, and ready to see the company in court. His personal credibility and that of the SFO are on the line.

SFO sources said discussions were still going on privately between SFO case controllers and lawyers from Allen & Overy and Linklaters, who are both representing BAE in the negotiations. BAE sources carried on insisting they "did not recognise any deadline".

A capitulation by BAE this week would be a turnaround for the agency, whose reputation was damaged three years ago when it was forced by Tony Blair's government to halt its investigation into BAE's Saudi arms deals. A decision to prosecute would not be the end of the story. Alderman would have to gain the formal consent of Lady Scotland, the attorney general, to press charges. This power is due to be abolished, but still exists. Her decision could take weeks or longer, and history suggests she may be lobbied by BAE or by members of the cabinet.

The last attorney general faced with the prospect of prosecuting BAE was Lord Goldsmith. He helped to force a closedown of the SFO's Saudi investigation in 2006 after an effective lobbying operation by BAE. His behaviour caused controversy about the politicisation of the role of the government's supposedly independent chief law officer.

After the Saudi investigation was squashed, the SFO was allowed to continue investigating BAE's deals in four other countries: Tanzania, the Czech Republic, South Africa, and Romania. BAE has denied all wrongdoing.

If criminal charges are brought, they are likely to involve at least the cases in Tanzania and the Czech Republic, where sources say the most progress has been made. BAE was refusing to comment last night.

The SFO first took up the task of trying to investigate BAE after the company's network of secret offshore "slush funds" was disclosed by the Guardian in an award winning series of investigations by the newspaper.

The fraud agency's confidence that it could get results was increased last week when, in a legal first, the bridge construction firm Mabey & Johnson agreed a deal to plead guilty to corruption concerning foreign contracts. It paid more than £6m in penalities, replaced a number of directors and promised to turn over a new leaf. The deal included reparations to Ghana and other countries where it admitted bribes were paid to officials and politicians.

The Mabey deal was the first successful corruption prosecution of any size borught by a British government agency since laws were passed more than seven years ago, explicitly banning foreign bribery.

It was seen as a template that BAE could be prepared to follow, of confession followed by relative leniency. But BAE until now has insisted that it was prepared to "allow the ongoing investigations to take their course".

Welcome to capitalism, BAE style.