An open letter to Climate Rush on suffrage and arson.

category bristol | the environment | opinion/analysis author Tuesday March 06, 2012 09:58author by Lucy Parsons Report this post to the editors

Dear Climate Rush

 Hi guys and good luck to you on setting up a new activist group in Bristol.

http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/707842

 I'm also very pleased that you, like London Climate Rush, invoke the spirit of the women's suffrage movement in all of your literature and support their cry “Deeds not words”.

 Though I'm a little concerned that you may may be taken in by a sanitised version of the, ongoing, struggle for the emancipation of women and men. When we forget the past we cannot hope to build the future

 Whilst the women's suffrage movement wore bonnets and sashes (as did most political movements in those hat wearing/ pre printed T shirt days) a potentially significant spanner in the suffrage activist tool-kit was the targeted use of violence.

 Here is a link to just one (academic and critical) overview.

 http://www.scribd.com/doc/62021541/An-Examination-of-Suffragette-Violence

 To save you reading it all, I'll highlight that there were 337 arson or bomb attacks claimed by the Women's Suffrage and Political Union in 1913 / 1914. This includes the destruction of the houses of two serving MPs and a number of pipe bombs placed in town halls throughout the country, though it does not include the far higher figure for activities not claimed by the WSPU though reported in the mainstream press, such as the total destruction of a colliery in South Shields. It's also worth noting that these clandestine attacks were an escalation of the even more wide spread suffrage activity of synchronised window smashing. A favourite target was the Ritz in London. That's the same Ritz which got smashed up again about this time last year, just as the Labour party leader was saying that the anti cuts movement should be more like the women's suffrage movement, thought I doubt this is what he meant!

 Here is a link to Michael Portilo (that bastion of all that is good) and a panel of academics from the Open University discussing the phenomena of militant suffrage.

http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/social-economic-history/listen-the-suffragettes

Here is a video of the recreation of suffragette Theresa Garnett attacking Winston Churchill at Bristol Temple Meads on 15th November 1909. http://www.brh.org.uk/video/suffragette.html

In fact despite the numerous attempts to reduce the women's suffrage movement to a group of passive, bonneted sash wearers, a fair amount of information on the WSPU is out their via your favourite search engine.

 Now to be clear I'm not in any way suggesting that you should emulate all the activities of the women's suffrage movement. More that you should be aware that when they said “Deeds not Words” they probably meant militant attacks on the symbols of male and class privilege rather than giving out heart shaped biscuits to employees of multimillion pound businesses .

 Yours

Lucy Parsons

author by Aunty Christpublication date Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:04Report this post to the editors

Thanks for taking the time to write this. Clear and precise and exactly whats needed to be said!!!

author by anonpublication date Tue Mar 06, 2012 14:03Report this post to the editors

great letter, thanks for putting it so well

author by Eliot Archerpublication date Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:42Report this post to the editors

I did many actions with the early 2009 Climate Rush. I left after about a year and your article articulated why I did far better than I ever could have. Thanks!!
La Lucha Sigue

author by Kalapublication date Wed Mar 07, 2012 13:47Report this post to the editors

Yes, well put. Real history is often not what we are told by those who make themselves the winners. Interesting links too. Thanks Lucy.

author by tanyapublication date Thu Mar 08, 2012 14:38Report this post to the editors

brilliant, thanks. I've passed this around everywhere to commemorate international women's day.

author by History geekpublication date Sun Mar 11, 2012 15:31Report this post to the editors

To add a brief point to the article, the class struggle seems to be ignored by many revisions of suffragette history, including the climate rush version.

While rich women in london were pulling publicity stunts, those working in the mills in lancaster, to take one example, were striking, making co-ops, getting huge numbers of signatures for petitions... OK, so maybe not always radical tactics, but really widespread and pretty impressive considering the working hours and conditions at work and at home they were putting up with at the same time, and a significant part of the movement. And women from working class backgrounds were treated far worse by the law than middle class or well-known women, such as the violence under which they were force-fed in the prisons.

I'd argue that these class-war based elements of the movement should be central any justice struggle hoping to learn from the suffragettes. Solidarity, not outreach.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2013 Bristol Indymedia. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Bristol Indymedia. Disclaimer | Privacy